Forum Groups
  All forums
    Help & Feedback
      Work in progress
      Finished Art
      Non-Max related

Featured Threads
  inspiration alert!!!
(37 replies)
  Indespensible MaxScripts, Plugins and 3rd Party Tools
(37 replies)
  The allmighty FREE Resources Thread !
(17 replies)
  spam alert!!!
(4886 replies)
  Maxforums member photo gallery index
(114 replies)
  Maxforums Member Tutorials
(89 replies)
  three cheers to maxforums...
(240 replies)
  101 Things you didnt know in Max...
(198 replies)
  A Face tutorial from MDB101 :D
(95 replies) Members Gallery
(516 replies)
(637 replies)
  Dub's Maxscript Tutorial Index
(119 replies)

Maxunderground news unavailable

First page  Go to the previous page   [01]  [02]  Go to the next page  Last page
AMD Ryzen: About time isnt it?
show user profile  ScotlandDave
Doesn't do anything to challenge the current slowdown in CPU performance, but at least AMD are finally undercutting and outperforming Intel again with it's new range of substantially cheaper than i7 cpu's:

Website | Blog | Contact | Vimeo

read 708 times
2/24/2017 7:04:16 PM (last edit: 2/24/2017 7:04:16 PM)
show user profile  Nik Clark
There doesn't seem to have been much development in CPU chips for years. Good to see AMD is on the ball again.

read 700 times
2/24/2017 7:51:54 PM (last edit: 2/24/2017 7:51:54 PM)
show user profile  FX
If it forces down the price of intels this can only be a good thing, what do they have to take on xeons?
read 689 times
2/24/2017 8:57:26 PM (last edit: 2/24/2017 8:57:26 PM)
show user profile  ScotlandDave
Haven't looked into that but I've heard nothing of dual-cpu support or the likes, which is at this point disappointing. It means its purely targeting the low mid level market with no emphasis on workstation grade computing - would love to see that. Fucking xeons are basically i7's with some extra bandwidth, a couple of cores and the cpu bridge 'unlocked' and triple the price tag. Intel have been naming their price for too long imo..

Website | Blog | Contact | Vimeo

read 682 times
2/24/2017 11:16:25 PM (last edit: 2/24/2017 11:16:25 PM)
show user profile  ScotlandDave
It looks like AMD Naples is the potential answer to the above.. If it's anything like Ryzen ( which might literally take the entire market by storm ) then there could be some reaaaallllllly interesting things to look forward to:

I'm sure the tech worms reading this will already know all of this stuff. It's all news to me atm. Where's Stabby these days the guy's a genius with this stuff?

[edit] Spoon when did you make unformatted urls just work? I've been typing in 'a href=' tags forever on here..

Website | Blog | Contact | Vimeo

read 677 times
2/25/2017 12:00:34 AM (last edit: 2/25/2017 12:01:51 AM)
show user profile  FX
@Dave, yeah I got tired of looking, all I can find is hype aimed at gamers and the "this vs that" brigade, I could build another 32 thread E5 2670 for a lot less.
read 669 times
2/25/2017 7:02:37 AM (last edit: 2/25/2017 7:02:37 AM)
show user profile  Garp
> Spoon when did you make unformatted urls just work? I've been typing in 'a href=' tags forever on here..

As far as I can remember it has always worked (as long as it's not https).

read 662 times
2/25/2017 10:10:59 AM (last edit: 2/25/2017 10:10:59 AM)
show user profile  dd
FX got to kinda agree with you on this, but we will see.

read 609 times
2/26/2017 6:14:31 PM (last edit: 2/26/2017 6:14:31 PM)
show user profile  Sir_Manfred
I'm looking forward to the reviews.
Hopefully there will be a price-war again. It's been a while.

Visit my Portfolio

read 585 times
2/27/2017 10:11:21 AM (last edit: 2/27/2017 10:11:21 AM)
show user profile  TiMoN
Been looking forward to this for a while.
The 1700-1800X seem like they could make good render machines, for a decent price.. bit of a pity that they dont support more than dual channell memory, but I am not sure how much difference this will really make in the real world.

Thinking that the 1600-1600X, is gonna be where I will be looking for a good gaming PC..

It would be a huge letdown, if they turn out to suck at gaming though.. After this much hype..

Terribly boring signature.
read 572 times
2/27/2017 1:17:12 PM (last edit: 2/27/2017 1:17:53 PM)
show user profile  spoon
Did i understand correctly that there are no ryzen models with less than 8 cores?

Dave: has been working like this for years

read 569 times
2/27/2017 1:18:43 PM (last edit: 2/27/2017 1:18:43 PM)
show user profile  TiMoN
I believe that only the Ryzen 7 series has 8/16 cores.
The 5 and 3 series will have from 4/4 to 6/12 cores

Terribly boring signature.
read 568 times
2/27/2017 1:39:24 PM (last edit: 2/27/2017 1:39:24 PM)
show user profile  npcph

looks like the new line needs some work.

read 517 times
3/2/2017 7:59:20 PM (last edit: 3/2/2017 7:59:41 PM)
show user profile  Sir_Manfred
I see mixed results on the gaming reviews. Some are great, others are disappoint.
It really just comes down to the fact that a lot of games aren't optimized for more than 4 cores, it seems.

Overall, though, AMD whoops some ass in multicore heavy applications. So that's good. Cheaper workstations :)

Visit my Portfolio

read 492 times
3/3/2017 10:39:07 AM (last edit: 3/3/2017 10:39:40 AM)
show user profile  ScotlandDave
I think we're pretty much approaching a brick-wall in terms of single-core performance with the current cpu architecture ( and the actual physical limitations of hardware down to the atomic level ) - more cores/threads is where it's at ( hence GPU computing ) and the sooner game developers start thinking that way the better ( because they influence such a huge swathe of popular opinion ). It would be sad if AMD in making the right decision ( more cores whilst sacrificing a snitch of single-threaded performance ) took the hit ( again ) due to peoples ignorance of the fact..

Website | Blog | Contact | Vimeo

read 490 times
3/3/2017 11:00:33 AM (last edit: 3/3/2017 11:04:22 AM)
First page  Go to the previous page   [01]  [02]  Go to the next page  Last page
#Maxforums IRC
Open chat window